Search all 大象APPsites
Menu
National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to healthcare
大象APP
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS庐) Program
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report Data Tools
- Network of Patient Safety Databases
- 大象APPQuality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- Surveys on Patient Safety Culture
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Search Data Sources Available From AHRQ
SHARE:
Search All Research Studies
大象APPResearch Studies Date
大象APPResearch Studies
Sign up:
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by 大象APPor authored by 大象APPresearchers.
Results
1 to 1 of 1 Research Studies DisplayedBhattacharjee P, Churpek MM, Snyder A
Detecting sepsis: are two opinions better than one?
Researchers conducted a study to characterize the agreement between different providers' suspicion of infection and the correlation with patient outcomes using prospective data from a general medicine ward. They concluded that provider disagreement regarding suspected infection is common, with RNs suspecting infection more often, suggesting that a collaborative model for sepsis detection may improve timing and accuracy.
AHRQ-funded; HS000078.
Citation: Bhattacharjee P, Churpek MM, Snyder A .
Detecting sepsis: are two opinions better than one?
J Hosp Med 2017 Apr;12(4):256-58. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2721.
.
.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Nursing, Risk, Sepsis
